Pages

Thursday, October 4, 2012

Women researchers as prolific as men in publishing papers

From LiveMint:  Women researchers as prolific as men in publishing papers

New Delhi: Women researchers in India are as prolific in publishing scientific papers as men in spite of being significantly fewer in number, says a study in Tuesday’s edition of Current Science.
While it’s established that many women drop out at progressive stages of their careers as scientists, the study in the peer-reviewed journal quantitatively establishes that—as a proportion of their representation in India’s population of scientists—women may not only be at par but better than their male counterparts.
For the study, the authors analysed—by gender—998 scientific papers published between 2004 and 2009 by researchers at the doctorate and post-doctorate levels. Generally, aspirant scientists are of ages 25-35 years at these stages of their careers. The study found that proportionally, there was barely any difference in the number of papers published by 358 women and 640 male researchers.
The study analysts found 26% of female research scholars published their findings in both science-citation index (SCI) and non-SCI journals; 11% in non-SCI and 63% in SCI journals. Almost similarly, 28% of male research scholars published both in SCI and non-SCI journals, 9% in non-SCI and 63% in SCI journals. SCI journals are those accessed by a database called the Science Citation Index, a compendium of more than 3,700 journals and a metric of their quality and outreach.
Other data show women are grossly under-represented as research scholars as well as in the larger scientific establishment. According to the department of science and technology, only about 37% of those with a PhD in science in India in 2005 were women; in general, only around 15% of India’s scientists were women, significantly lower than the 25% in the US and the European Union.
“This study is specific to women at the PhD and post-doctorate level and what’s most striking is there’s no difference in quality in their output,” said Rajesh Luthra, the main author of the study and head of the human resources department of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India’s largest group of publicly funded research laboratories.
The data accentuated the fact that it was harder for women to have equally productive careers in science as men, he said. “The recently constituted task force for women in science talks about this,” he said.
In 2005, India’s science ministry constituted a committee to address the poor representation of women in science. Under-representation of women in science had grabbed international headlines after the then Harvard president and former US secretary of treasury Lawrence Summers attributed “differences in aptitude” as one reason for the lower representation of women in the upper echelons of science and engineering.
“There is a drastic drop in the percentage of women from the doctoral level to the scientist/faculty position, suggesting a bottleneck at the employment stage due to recruitment procedures and family responsibilities,” the committee said in its report, made public last year. “Focused efforts are needed to identify the sources of this precipitous drop and counteract them,” it said.
Garima Balwani, who’s pursuing a PhD in pharmacy at the Birla Institute of Technology and Science in Pilani, says she has never experienced any bias academically. “There are no separate restrictions for women studying science. Even to get papers published, there are no restrictions. Journals only consider your credibility,” she said.
Private companies, however, discriminated against women, she said. During her internship at a company she did not want to name, Balwani could not get hands-on training or do any actual research. “That particular company hired women only in selective departments like patent and regulatory affairs. They did not hire women in the department which involves actual research work,” she said.
Balwani added that several women who got a PhD also preferred to get into teaching, a point also emphasized by the science ministry committee.

 

No comments:

Post a Comment