Flowstones are composed of sheetlike deposits of calcite formed where water flows down the walls or along the floors of a cave. They are typically found in "solution", or limestone caves, where they are the most common speleothem. However, they may form in any type of cave where water enters that has picked up dissolved minerals.
The deposits may grade into thin sheets called "draperies" or "curtains" where they go over overhanging portions of the wall. Some draperies are translucent, and some have brown and beige layers that look much like bacon (often termed "cave bacon").
A soda straw (or simply straw) is a speleothem in the form of a hollow mineral tube. They grow in places where water leaches slowly through cracks in rock, such as on the roofs of caves. A soda straw can turn into a stalactite if the hole at the bottom is blocked, or if the water begins flowing on the outside surface of the tube.
These tubes form when calcium carbonate or calcium sulfate dissolved in the water comes out of solution and is deposited. In soda straws, as each drop hovers at the tip, it deposits a ring of mineral at its edge. It then falls and a new drop takes its place. Each successive drop of water deposits a little more mineral before falling, and eventually a tube is built up. Stalagmites or flowstone may form where the water drops hit the cave floor.
Soda straws are some of the most fragile of speleothems. Like helictites, they can be easily crushed or broken by the slightest touch. Because of this, soda straws are rarely seen within arms' reach in tourist caves. When left alone, soda straws have been known to grow up to 30 feet long.
Soda straws are also known as Tubular Stalactites.
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
Shopping Sprees, and Paying Forever
It's rather a cliche that what girls and women most like to do is shop, and what they most like to buy is shoes and clothes. (I like to shop, too, but what I most like to buy is books! But then, I do work from home.)
In any event, the United States is currently undergoing a financial crisis, with many people unable to pay for their home mortgages and their credit card bills.
And what's happening? Why, they are being rewarded for their fiscal irresponsibility. The government and local programs are stepping in to help them out - placing the burden for keeping these people in homes they can't afford, and with credit they don't deserve to have - on the banks and credit card companies, who are being made out to be the villains of the peice.
Oh, I don't say that the ways of banks seem rather counter-intuitive. You have a low interest rate as long as you make your payments on time, but miss one payment and you're interest rate goes up! So if you were unable to make your payment when the interest rate was low, how do they expect you to be able to make it now that it is high?
But that's not the point of this post. The point of this post is rather a moral one - if you enter into obligations, you should keep them. And by exercising a little common sense and a little knowledge of math, you should be able to see what those obligations will be, if you'll be able to make them, and if you can't... then you dont enter into them to begin with!
Take buying something with a credit card. Whenever you get a credit card, you get lots of papers explaining the rules and regulations of that card. Most importantly, it will tell you how much interest you will have to pay on anything you purchase.
How many people get a credit with a $4,000 limit, and buy a $1,000 dress, without bothering to figure out how much they'll have to pay each month? Then they get their credit card bill and realize that with the cost of their rent, their car payment, their this and their that, they can't afford that extra credit card payment.
So they default on the credit card. And because the department store where they purchased the dress has already been paid in full by the credit card company (who has loaned the purchaser the money to get that dress), the department store has their money, and will not send a collection agent to your house to repossess that dress. (That happens with cars, however! And homes!)
So it is the credit card agency that is out $1,000.
Now, it used to be that people would move heaven and earth to pay their credit card bills, and only a small percentage would default.
Now, it's common place. People are encouraged to default on their credit card bills. After all, they say, it's just not fair that your credit card company charges you so much interest...they tricked you into buying more than you could afford and of course you shouldn't have to pay it all back!
Every day, if you listen to the radio, you will hear commericals for Debt Relief companies saying, "Here's powerful information credit card companies dont' want you to know. If you are more than $14,000 in credit card debt, you have the right to settle that debt for pennies on the dollar."
You may have the legal right, squeezed out of the credit card companies by a government that wants all debt to belong to them, but you do not have a moral right. If you bought something, you should pay for it. Otherwise, you are stealing.
That is what you must realize when you get your "easy money" - your credit card. It does not represent units, it does not represent "free money," it represents a debt that moral people know they will have to pay.
The government, of course, is busy saying that it's immoral for the people to whom you owe money to expect you to pay your bills, since you were tricked into buying more than you could afford, and you should get to keep whatever you bought (the house, the car, the clothes) and the people who sold it to you should have to pay you, instead.
A sad state of affairs.
In any event, the United States is currently undergoing a financial crisis, with many people unable to pay for their home mortgages and their credit card bills.
And what's happening? Why, they are being rewarded for their fiscal irresponsibility. The government and local programs are stepping in to help them out - placing the burden for keeping these people in homes they can't afford, and with credit they don't deserve to have - on the banks and credit card companies, who are being made out to be the villains of the peice.
Oh, I don't say that the ways of banks seem rather counter-intuitive. You have a low interest rate as long as you make your payments on time, but miss one payment and you're interest rate goes up! So if you were unable to make your payment when the interest rate was low, how do they expect you to be able to make it now that it is high?
But that's not the point of this post. The point of this post is rather a moral one - if you enter into obligations, you should keep them. And by exercising a little common sense and a little knowledge of math, you should be able to see what those obligations will be, if you'll be able to make them, and if you can't... then you dont enter into them to begin with!
Take buying something with a credit card. Whenever you get a credit card, you get lots of papers explaining the rules and regulations of that card. Most importantly, it will tell you how much interest you will have to pay on anything you purchase.
How many people get a credit with a $4,000 limit, and buy a $1,000 dress, without bothering to figure out how much they'll have to pay each month? Then they get their credit card bill and realize that with the cost of their rent, their car payment, their this and their that, they can't afford that extra credit card payment.
So they default on the credit card. And because the department store where they purchased the dress has already been paid in full by the credit card company (who has loaned the purchaser the money to get that dress), the department store has their money, and will not send a collection agent to your house to repossess that dress. (That happens with cars, however! And homes!)
So it is the credit card agency that is out $1,000.
Now, it used to be that people would move heaven and earth to pay their credit card bills, and only a small percentage would default.
Now, it's common place. People are encouraged to default on their credit card bills. After all, they say, it's just not fair that your credit card company charges you so much interest...they tricked you into buying more than you could afford and of course you shouldn't have to pay it all back!
Every day, if you listen to the radio, you will hear commericals for Debt Relief companies saying, "Here's powerful information credit card companies dont' want you to know. If you are more than $14,000 in credit card debt, you have the right to settle that debt for pennies on the dollar."
You may have the legal right, squeezed out of the credit card companies by a government that wants all debt to belong to them, but you do not have a moral right. If you bought something, you should pay for it. Otherwise, you are stealing.
That is what you must realize when you get your "easy money" - your credit card. It does not represent units, it does not represent "free money," it represents a debt that moral people know they will have to pay.
The government, of course, is busy saying that it's immoral for the people to whom you owe money to expect you to pay your bills, since you were tricked into buying more than you could afford, and you should get to keep whatever you bought (the house, the car, the clothes) and the people who sold it to you should have to pay you, instead.
A sad state of affairs.
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
What's Math Got to Do With It?
Yesterday I profiled a book that sought to taught adults math, and relate it to "the real world." It stopped just short of algebra. The author, actress and mathematician (and by that I mean she is really a mathamatician, working in the profession, not just someone who likes math) has two other books, Kiss My Math and Hot X, Algebra Exposed.
This book, What's Math Got to Do With It? by Jo Boaler does not teach math, but rather tries to help parents realize how important math is for their girls, and that it is a stereotype that girls are no good at math.
I'd say that 99% of girls, when they reach "middle school" will start to be subjected to teasing, either about their appearance, or about their math skills, or about their lack of skills, anything. Just as girls can't win in the looks department (there's always a guy who will complain about something, sending a perfectly attractive girl into agonies of despair), they can't win in the knowledge department either.
Well, enough of that rant, back to the book:
Table of Contents:
Introduction: Understanding the urgency
1. What is math any why do we all need it?
2. What's going wrong in classrooms? Identifying the problems.
3. A vision for a better future: Effective classroom approaches
4. Taming the Monster: New forms of testing that encourage learning
5. Stuck in the Slow Lane: How American grouping systems perpetuate low achievement
6. Paying the price for sugar and spice: How girls and women are kept out of math and science
7. Key strategies and ways of working
8. Giving Children the best mathematical start: Activities and advice
9. Making a difference through work with schools
This book, What's Math Got to Do With It? by Jo Boaler does not teach math, but rather tries to help parents realize how important math is for their girls, and that it is a stereotype that girls are no good at math.
I'd say that 99% of girls, when they reach "middle school" will start to be subjected to teasing, either about their appearance, or about their math skills, or about their lack of skills, anything. Just as girls can't win in the looks department (there's always a guy who will complain about something, sending a perfectly attractive girl into agonies of despair), they can't win in the knowledge department either.
Well, enough of that rant, back to the book:
Table of Contents:
Introduction: Understanding the urgency
1. What is math any why do we all need it?
2. What's going wrong in classrooms? Identifying the problems.
3. A vision for a better future: Effective classroom approaches
4. Taming the Monster: New forms of testing that encourage learning
5. Stuck in the Slow Lane: How American grouping systems perpetuate low achievement
6. Paying the price for sugar and spice: How girls and women are kept out of math and science
7. Key strategies and ways of working
8. Giving Children the best mathematical start: Activities and advice
9. Making a difference through work with schools
Monday, March 29, 2010
Math Doesn't Suck: How To Survive Middle Schoool Math Without Losing Your Mind or Breaking a Nail
So important is math for all the other sciences...and indeed, just for living...that I am going to devote a couple of posts to books which a parent should read, in order to help their kids - and in particular their girls, with math.
Even today, in the 21st century, girls who like math begin to "lose interest" once the higher grades are reached. That is because they buy into the stereotype that girls can't handle math.
Of course they can. Unfortunately, "middle school" is the time when girls hormones start to kick in, and they start spending more time thinking about if a boy finds them "pretty" then they do about their math. And of course, by no means must they be smarter than any boy they're interested in - that's the way to lose a boyfriend right there!
(Indeed, rather than a book on math, I think girls would do better to have books on maintaining their self-esteem, ignoring the insidious mass media that permeates their lives and tells them they must be thin, they must have no spots on their face, they must have white teeth, and so on... but that's a rant for a different time.)
I don't really care for the title of this book, Math Doesn't Suck: How to Survive Middle School Math Without Losing YOur Mind or Breaking a Nail. What's "breaking a nail" got to do with it? And what's wrong with breaking a nail? We're talking about school kids here, not models in the making!
Here are the chapter titles:
Part I: Factors and Multiples Don't Suck
Chapter 1: How to make a killing on Ebay (Prime numbers and prime factorization)
Chapter 2: Do you still have a crush on him? (Finding the greatest common factor)
Chapter 3: You Can Never Have Too Many Shoes (Multiples and the Lowest Common Multiple (LCM)
Quiz #1: Are you a mathophobe?
Part II: Fractions Don't Suck
Chapter 4: Everything you wanted to know about pizza but were afraid to ask
(Introduction to factors and mixed numbers.)
Chapter 5: How many Iced Lattes can these actors drink? (Multiplying and dividing fractions...and reciprocals)
Chapter 6: When to seriously stop raiding the refrigerator (Equivalent fractions and reducing fractions)
Chapter 7: Is your sister trying to cheat you out of your fair share? (Comparing fractions)
Chapter 8: How much do you and your best friend have in common (Common denominators...and adding and subtracting fractions)
Chapter 9: Choosing the perfect necklace (Complex fractions)
Part III: Decimals Don't Suck
Chapter 10: What every savvy shopper should know (all about decimals)
Chapter 11: Why calculators would make terrible boyfriends (converting fractions and mixed numbers to decimals)
Chapter 12: How to entertain yourself while babysitting a devil child (Converting decimals to fractions)
Part IV: Percents join the party...and they don't suck, either
Chapter 13: Sale of the Century (Converting percents to and from decimals and fractions
Chapter 14: A Choreographed Performance (Mixing fractions, decimals and percents together
Part V: Word Problems Don't Suck
Chapter 15: The universal language of love...and math (Introduction to word problems and "Percent of"/"Percent Off")
Chapter 16: Does she ever get off the phone? (Ratios)
Chapter 17: The Perks of a Southern Drawl (Rates and Unit Rates)
Chapter 18: Filmmaker Extraordinaire (Proportions)
Chapter 19: Are you drinking enough water (Unit conversions)
Part VI: Even algebra Doesn't Suck
Chapter 20: Who's the Cute new foreign exchange student? (Introduction to solving for X)
Chapter 21: Romeo and Juliet: (Introduction to Solving for X In word problems)
Troubleshooting Guide: Where to turn when you don't know what to do
The Smart Girl's REsource Guide
Multiplication Tables
Answe key
Index
About the author:
Best known for her role as Winnie Cooper on The Wonder Years and Elsie Snuffin on The West Wing, Danica McKellar is also an internationally recognized mathematician and advocate for math education.
She also has a new book out, Kiss My Math.
http://danicamckellar.com/
Even today, in the 21st century, girls who like math begin to "lose interest" once the higher grades are reached. That is because they buy into the stereotype that girls can't handle math.
Of course they can. Unfortunately, "middle school" is the time when girls hormones start to kick in, and they start spending more time thinking about if a boy finds them "pretty" then they do about their math. And of course, by no means must they be smarter than any boy they're interested in - that's the way to lose a boyfriend right there!
(Indeed, rather than a book on math, I think girls would do better to have books on maintaining their self-esteem, ignoring the insidious mass media that permeates their lives and tells them they must be thin, they must have no spots on their face, they must have white teeth, and so on... but that's a rant for a different time.)
I don't really care for the title of this book, Math Doesn't Suck: How to Survive Middle School Math Without Losing YOur Mind or Breaking a Nail. What's "breaking a nail" got to do with it? And what's wrong with breaking a nail? We're talking about school kids here, not models in the making!
Here are the chapter titles:
Part I: Factors and Multiples Don't Suck
Chapter 1: How to make a killing on Ebay (Prime numbers and prime factorization)
Chapter 2: Do you still have a crush on him? (Finding the greatest common factor)
Chapter 3: You Can Never Have Too Many Shoes (Multiples and the Lowest Common Multiple (LCM)
Quiz #1: Are you a mathophobe?
Part II: Fractions Don't Suck
Chapter 4: Everything you wanted to know about pizza but were afraid to ask
(Introduction to factors and mixed numbers.)
Chapter 5: How many Iced Lattes can these actors drink? (Multiplying and dividing fractions...and reciprocals)
Chapter 6: When to seriously stop raiding the refrigerator (Equivalent fractions and reducing fractions)
Chapter 7: Is your sister trying to cheat you out of your fair share? (Comparing fractions)
Chapter 8: How much do you and your best friend have in common (Common denominators...and adding and subtracting fractions)
Chapter 9: Choosing the perfect necklace (Complex fractions)
Part III: Decimals Don't Suck
Chapter 10: What every savvy shopper should know (all about decimals)
Chapter 11: Why calculators would make terrible boyfriends (converting fractions and mixed numbers to decimals)
Chapter 12: How to entertain yourself while babysitting a devil child (Converting decimals to fractions)
Part IV: Percents join the party...and they don't suck, either
Chapter 13: Sale of the Century (Converting percents to and from decimals and fractions
Chapter 14: A Choreographed Performance (Mixing fractions, decimals and percents together
Part V: Word Problems Don't Suck
Chapter 15: The universal language of love...and math (Introduction to word problems and "Percent of"/"Percent Off")
Chapter 16: Does she ever get off the phone? (Ratios)
Chapter 17: The Perks of a Southern Drawl (Rates and Unit Rates)
Chapter 18: Filmmaker Extraordinaire (Proportions)
Chapter 19: Are you drinking enough water (Unit conversions)
Part VI: Even algebra Doesn't Suck
Chapter 20: Who's the Cute new foreign exchange student? (Introduction to solving for X)
Chapter 21: Romeo and Juliet: (Introduction to Solving for X In word problems)
Troubleshooting Guide: Where to turn when you don't know what to do
The Smart Girl's REsource Guide
Multiplication Tables
Answe key
Index
About the author:
Best known for her role as Winnie Cooper on The Wonder Years and Elsie Snuffin on The West Wing, Danica McKellar is also an internationally recognized mathematician and advocate for math education.
She also has a new book out, Kiss My Math.
http://danicamckellar.com/
Sunday, March 28, 2010
Spelunking, caving and geologists
Do you know what spelunking is? That's the British term for caving - exploring caves. Caving can be very dangerous - lots of people get lost in caves every year. So you never want to go caving unless you're with a group of people, have all the proper equipment - ropes, compasses, flashlights, warm clothing, etc., and let someone know where you're going. Never venture into a cave alone!
The way to start out your caving career is to visit the vast "commercial caves" in the United States. The most famous is Carlsbad Caverns, but there are others.
I visited the Luray Caverns yesterday. As you drive up to the complex - there's a building for the Luray Caverns, another one for a Car Collection, and another one for a shop, you'd never suspect that hundreds of feet beneath your feet, there are beautiful caverns filled with stalactites, stalagmites, and all kinds of beautiful rock formations.
The "Draperies" - stalacties that look like draperies.
You can't really tell from this photo, but if you're actually there, when you look at the water, what you think you're seeing is stalactites and so on...but actually it is a reflection of the roof above. The pool itself is only about six inches to a foot deep, and is the largest lake in the Luray Caverns. You can't get the impact from this photo, but it was quite beautiful.
The "Fried Eggs". Two young stalagmites that were broken off at their base, and the water has weathered them such that this is what they look like today.
But that whole area of Virginia has such caverns...just a few miles away from the Luray Caverns are the Shenandoah Caverns, which unfortunately I did not go into, and a few others.
Unfortunately, the flash on my camera wouldn't work, and try as I might I couldn't hold my camera steady enough to get clear photos... about 4/5ths of the picures I did take didn't turn out.
Here's the description of the cave from Wikipedia (which is an open source site. "Open source" or "Copyright free" means that anyone can share the text found there. It was written to be shared. If a piece of writing is copyrighted, that means you can't share it without the permission of the original author.
Luray Caverns, originally called Luray Cave, is a large, celebrated commercial cave just west of Luray, Virginia, USA, which has drawn many visitors since its discovery in 1878. The underground cavern system is generously adorned with speleothems (columns, mud flows, stalactites, stalagmites, flowstone, mirrored pools, etc). The caverns are perhaps best known for the Great Stalacpipe Organ, a lithophone made from solenoid fired strikers that tap stalactites of various sizes to produce tones similar to those of xylophones, tuning forks, or bells.
Geology
The Caverns are situated in the Shenandoah Valley just to the east of the Allegheny Range of the Appalachian Mountains in Luray, Virginia. The Valley extends from the Blue Ridge in the north to the south end of Massanutten Mountain. Cave Hill, 927 feet (283 m) above sea level, had long been an object of local interest on account of its pits and oval hollows or sinkholes (known as karst) through one of which the discoverers of Luray Caverns entered.
Luray Caverns does not date beyond the Tertiary period, though carved from the Silurian limestone. At some period, niches and already formed chambers were completely filled with water, highly charged with acid, which then slowly began to eat away at much of the softer material composing much of the walls, ceilings and floors. One particular area that shows this high level of water is Elfin Ramble where water marks of oscillation are highly visible on the ceiling.
The temperature inside the caverns is uniformly 54 °F (12 °C),[2] comparable to that of Mammoth Cave in Kentucky.
Speleothem formation
As with other limestone or "solution" caves, formations at Luray Caverns result from a solution of calcium carbonate giving up some of its carbon dioxide, thus allowing a precipitation of lime to form. This precipitation begins as a thin deposit ring of crystallized calcite, but continues to collect, creating stalactites and other types of dripstone and flowstone. Formations at Luray Caverns are white in color if the calcium carbonate is in its pure form. Other colors reflect impurities in the calcite resulting from elements absorbed from the soil or rock layers: reds and yellows due to iron and iron-stained clays; black from manganese dioxide; blues and greens from solutions of copper compounds. Luray Caverns remains an active cave where new formation deposits accumulate at the rate of about one cubic inch every 120 years.
After the water had been mostly removed by a lowering in the water table, these eroded forms remained and growth began to take hold via stalactites, stalagmites, columns, etc. Some notable formations include the "Leaning Column", undermined and tilting like the campanile of Pisa; the Organ, a large shield formation, that was used from very early on as an instrument to a variety of folk and religious songs and a vast bed of disintegrated carbonates left by the water in its retreat through the great space called the "Elfin Ramble".
The cavern is yellow, brown or red because of water, chemicals and minerals. The new stalactites growing from the old, and made of hard carbonates that had already once been used, are usually white as snow though often pink or amber-colored. The Empress Column is a stalagmite 35 feet (11 m) high, rose-colored, and elaborately draped. The "Double Column", named from Professors Henry and Baird, is made of two fluted pillars side by side, the one 25 ft (7.6 m) the other 60 feet (18 m) high, a mass of snowy alabaster. Several stalactites in Giant's Hall exceed 5 feet (1.5 m) in length. The "Pluto's Ghost", a pillar, is a ghostly white.
The cascades are formations like foaming cataracts caught in mid-air and transformed into milk-white or amber alabaster. Brands Cascade, a particularly fine one, is 40 feet (12 m) high and 30 feet (9.1 m) wide, and is a wax-like white.
"Saracen's tent" is considered to be one of the most well-formed draperies in the world.Draperies are abundant throughout the cavern and one of the best examples is Saracen's Tent. The drapery formation can be found in all major rooms and ring like bells when struck heavily by the hand. Their origin and also that of certain so-called scarfs and blankets is from carbonates deposited by water trickling down a sloping and corrugated surface. Sixteen of these alabaster scarfs hang side by side in Hoveys Balcony, three white and fine as crape shawls, thirteen striated like agate with every possible shade of brown.
Streams and true springs are absent, but there are hundreds of basins, varying from 1 to 50 feet (15 m) in diameter, and from 6 inches (150 mm) to 15 feet (4.6 m) in depth. The water in them contains carbonate of lime, which often forms concretions, called pearls, eggs, and snowballs, according to their size. On the fracture these spherical growths are found to be radiated in structure.
Calcite crystals line the sides and bottom of water-filled cavities. Variations of level at different periods are marked by rings, ridges and ruffled margins. These are strongly marked about Broaddus Lake and the curved ramparts of the Castles on the Rhine. Here also are polished stalagmites, a rich buff slashed with white, and others, like huge mushrooms, with a velvety coat of red, purple or olive-tinted crystals. In some of the smaller basins with an excess of carbonic acid, there is formed, besides the crystal bed below, a film above, shot like a sheet of ice across the surface. One pool 12 feet (3.7 m) wide is thus covered so as to show but a third of its surface.
The quantity of water in the cavern varies greatly at different seasons. Hence some stalactites have their tips under water long enough to allow tassels of crystals to grow on them, which, in a drier season, are again coated over with stalactitic matter; and thus singular distortions are occasioned. Contiguous stalactites are often inwrapped thus until they assume an almost globular form, through which by making a section the primary tubes appear. Contorted stalactites may be caused by lateral outgrowths of crystals growing from the side of an active stalactite, or to deflections caused by currents of air, or to the existence of a diminutive fungus peculiar to the locality and designated from its habitat Mucor stalaclitis.
The dimensions of the chambers included in Luray Caverns cannot be easily stated, due to the great irregularity of their outlines. There are several tiers of galleries, and the vertical depth from the highest to the lowest is 260 feet (79 m).
Luray Cavern waters
There is a spring of water called Dream Lake that has an almost mirror like appearance. Stalactites are reflected in the water making them appear to be stalagmites. This illusion is often so convincing that people are unable to see the real bottom. It looks quite deep, as the stalactites are higher above the water, but at its deepest point the water is only around 20 inches deep. The lake is connected to a spring that continues deeper into the caverns. The Wishing Well is a green pond with coins three feet deep at the bottom. Like Dream Lake, the well also gives an illusion, however it is reversed. The pond looks 3-4 feet deep but at its deepest point it is actually 6-7 feet deep.
History
Discovery
Luray Caverns was discovered on August 13, 1878 by five local men, including Andrew J. Campbell (a local tinsmith), his 13-year-old nephew Quint, and local photographer Benton Stebbins.[1] Their attention had been attracted by a protruding limestone outcrop and by a nearby sinkhole noted to have cool air issuing from it. Seeking an underground cavern, the men started to dig and, about 4 hours later, a hole was created for the smallest men (Andrew and Quint) to squeeze through, slide down a rope and explore by candlelight. The first column they saw was named the Washington Column, in honor of the first United States President. Upon entering the area called Skeleton's Gorge, bone fragments (among other artifacts) were found embedded in calcite. Other traces of previous human occupation included pieces of charcoal, flint, and human bone fragments embedded in stalagmite. A skeleton, thought to be that of a Native American girl, found in one of the chasms, was estimated, from the current rate of stalagmitic growth, to be not more than 500 years old. Her remains may have slipped into the caverns after her burial hole collapsed due to a sinkhole, although the real cause is unknown. They are now in storage at the National Museum of American History in Washington, D.C.
Litigation
Sam Buracker of Luray owned the land on which the cavern entrance was found. Because of uncollected debts, a court-ordered auction of all his land was held on September 14, 1878. Andrew Campbell, William Campbell, and Benton Stebbins purchased the cave tract, but kept their discovery secret until after the sale. Because the true value of the property was not realized until after the purchase, legal wrangling ensued for the next 2 years with attempts to prove fraud and decide rightful ownership. In April 1881, the Supreme Court of Virginia nullified the purchase by the cave discoverers. William T. Biedler of Baltimore (Buracker's in-law and major creditor) then sold the property to The Luray Cave and Hotel Company, a subsidiary of the Shenandoah Railroad Company. (The SRC became the Norfolk and Western Railroad Company in April 1881.) David Kagery of Luray and George Marshall of Uniontown, Pennsylvania, purchased the property in July 1890 and in October of that year the tract was sold to the Valley Land and Improvement Company. Under bankruptcy proceedings in 1893, the property was bought by Luray Caverns Company, owned by J. Kemp Bartlett of Baltimore.
Despite the legal disputes, rumors of the caverns' impressive formations spread quickly. Professor Jerome J. Collins, the Arctic explorer, postponed his departure on an ill-fated North Pole expedition to visit the caverns. The Smithsonian Institution sent a delegation of nine scientists to investigate. The next edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica devoted an unprecedented page and a half to the cave's wonders and Alexander J. Brand, Jr., a correspondent for the New York Times, was the first professional travel writer to visit and popularize the Caverns.
Sanatorium
In 1901, the cool, supposedly pure air of Luray Caverns was forced through the rooms of the Limair Sanatorium, erected on the summit of Cave Hill by Colonel T.C. Northcott, former president of the Luray Caverns Corporation.[1] The Colonel billed "Limair," as the first air-conditioned home in the United States. On the hottest day in summer, the interior of the house was kept at a cool and comfortable 70 °F (21 °C). By sinking a shaft five feet in diameter down to a cavern chamber and installing a 42-inch (1,100 mm) fan powered by a 5 horsepower (3.7 kW) electric motor, Northcott’s system could change out the air through the entire house about every 4 minutes. Tests made over successive years by means of culture media and sterile plates, were considered to have demonstrated the "perfect bacteriologic purity" of the air, purportedly a benefit to those suffering various respiratory illnesses. This "purity" was explained by a natural filtration process with air drawn into the caverns through myriad rocky crevices, then further cleansing by air floating over the transparent springs and pools, the product finally being supplied to the inmates of the sanatorium. (The "Limair" burned down in the early 1900s but was subsequently rebuilt as a brick building.) The Luray Caverns Corporation, which was chartered by Northcott, purchased the caverns in February 1905 and continues to hold the property today.
Portions of the Caverns are open to the public and have long been electrically lighted. The registered number of visitors in 1906 was 18,000, but now, about 500,000 guests visit each year.
In 1974, the National Park Service and the Department of Interior designated Luray Caverns as a National Natural Landmark.
The way to start out your caving career is to visit the vast "commercial caves" in the United States. The most famous is Carlsbad Caverns, but there are others.
I visited the Luray Caverns yesterday. As you drive up to the complex - there's a building for the Luray Caverns, another one for a Car Collection, and another one for a shop, you'd never suspect that hundreds of feet beneath your feet, there are beautiful caverns filled with stalactites, stalagmites, and all kinds of beautiful rock formations.
The "Draperies" - stalacties that look like draperies.
You can't really tell from this photo, but if you're actually there, when you look at the water, what you think you're seeing is stalactites and so on...but actually it is a reflection of the roof above. The pool itself is only about six inches to a foot deep, and is the largest lake in the Luray Caverns. You can't get the impact from this photo, but it was quite beautiful.
The "Fried Eggs". Two young stalagmites that were broken off at their base, and the water has weathered them such that this is what they look like today.
But that whole area of Virginia has such caverns...just a few miles away from the Luray Caverns are the Shenandoah Caverns, which unfortunately I did not go into, and a few others.
Unfortunately, the flash on my camera wouldn't work, and try as I might I couldn't hold my camera steady enough to get clear photos... about 4/5ths of the picures I did take didn't turn out.
Here's the description of the cave from Wikipedia (which is an open source site. "Open source" or "Copyright free" means that anyone can share the text found there. It was written to be shared. If a piece of writing is copyrighted, that means you can't share it without the permission of the original author.
Luray Caverns, originally called Luray Cave, is a large, celebrated commercial cave just west of Luray, Virginia, USA, which has drawn many visitors since its discovery in 1878. The underground cavern system is generously adorned with speleothems (columns, mud flows, stalactites, stalagmites, flowstone, mirrored pools, etc). The caverns are perhaps best known for the Great Stalacpipe Organ, a lithophone made from solenoid fired strikers that tap stalactites of various sizes to produce tones similar to those of xylophones, tuning forks, or bells.
Geology
The Caverns are situated in the Shenandoah Valley just to the east of the Allegheny Range of the Appalachian Mountains in Luray, Virginia. The Valley extends from the Blue Ridge in the north to the south end of Massanutten Mountain. Cave Hill, 927 feet (283 m) above sea level, had long been an object of local interest on account of its pits and oval hollows or sinkholes (known as karst) through one of which the discoverers of Luray Caverns entered.
Luray Caverns does not date beyond the Tertiary period, though carved from the Silurian limestone. At some period, niches and already formed chambers were completely filled with water, highly charged with acid, which then slowly began to eat away at much of the softer material composing much of the walls, ceilings and floors. One particular area that shows this high level of water is Elfin Ramble where water marks of oscillation are highly visible on the ceiling.
The temperature inside the caverns is uniformly 54 °F (12 °C),[2] comparable to that of Mammoth Cave in Kentucky.
Speleothem formation
As with other limestone or "solution" caves, formations at Luray Caverns result from a solution of calcium carbonate giving up some of its carbon dioxide, thus allowing a precipitation of lime to form. This precipitation begins as a thin deposit ring of crystallized calcite, but continues to collect, creating stalactites and other types of dripstone and flowstone. Formations at Luray Caverns are white in color if the calcium carbonate is in its pure form. Other colors reflect impurities in the calcite resulting from elements absorbed from the soil or rock layers: reds and yellows due to iron and iron-stained clays; black from manganese dioxide; blues and greens from solutions of copper compounds. Luray Caverns remains an active cave where new formation deposits accumulate at the rate of about one cubic inch every 120 years.
After the water had been mostly removed by a lowering in the water table, these eroded forms remained and growth began to take hold via stalactites, stalagmites, columns, etc. Some notable formations include the "Leaning Column", undermined and tilting like the campanile of Pisa; the Organ, a large shield formation, that was used from very early on as an instrument to a variety of folk and religious songs and a vast bed of disintegrated carbonates left by the water in its retreat through the great space called the "Elfin Ramble".
The cavern is yellow, brown or red because of water, chemicals and minerals. The new stalactites growing from the old, and made of hard carbonates that had already once been used, are usually white as snow though often pink or amber-colored. The Empress Column is a stalagmite 35 feet (11 m) high, rose-colored, and elaborately draped. The "Double Column", named from Professors Henry and Baird, is made of two fluted pillars side by side, the one 25 ft (7.6 m) the other 60 feet (18 m) high, a mass of snowy alabaster. Several stalactites in Giant's Hall exceed 5 feet (1.5 m) in length. The "Pluto's Ghost", a pillar, is a ghostly white.
The cascades are formations like foaming cataracts caught in mid-air and transformed into milk-white or amber alabaster. Brands Cascade, a particularly fine one, is 40 feet (12 m) high and 30 feet (9.1 m) wide, and is a wax-like white.
"Saracen's tent" is considered to be one of the most well-formed draperies in the world.Draperies are abundant throughout the cavern and one of the best examples is Saracen's Tent. The drapery formation can be found in all major rooms and ring like bells when struck heavily by the hand. Their origin and also that of certain so-called scarfs and blankets is from carbonates deposited by water trickling down a sloping and corrugated surface. Sixteen of these alabaster scarfs hang side by side in Hoveys Balcony, three white and fine as crape shawls, thirteen striated like agate with every possible shade of brown.
Streams and true springs are absent, but there are hundreds of basins, varying from 1 to 50 feet (15 m) in diameter, and from 6 inches (150 mm) to 15 feet (4.6 m) in depth. The water in them contains carbonate of lime, which often forms concretions, called pearls, eggs, and snowballs, according to their size. On the fracture these spherical growths are found to be radiated in structure.
Calcite crystals line the sides and bottom of water-filled cavities. Variations of level at different periods are marked by rings, ridges and ruffled margins. These are strongly marked about Broaddus Lake and the curved ramparts of the Castles on the Rhine. Here also are polished stalagmites, a rich buff slashed with white, and others, like huge mushrooms, with a velvety coat of red, purple or olive-tinted crystals. In some of the smaller basins with an excess of carbonic acid, there is formed, besides the crystal bed below, a film above, shot like a sheet of ice across the surface. One pool 12 feet (3.7 m) wide is thus covered so as to show but a third of its surface.
The quantity of water in the cavern varies greatly at different seasons. Hence some stalactites have their tips under water long enough to allow tassels of crystals to grow on them, which, in a drier season, are again coated over with stalactitic matter; and thus singular distortions are occasioned. Contiguous stalactites are often inwrapped thus until they assume an almost globular form, through which by making a section the primary tubes appear. Contorted stalactites may be caused by lateral outgrowths of crystals growing from the side of an active stalactite, or to deflections caused by currents of air, or to the existence of a diminutive fungus peculiar to the locality and designated from its habitat Mucor stalaclitis.
The dimensions of the chambers included in Luray Caverns cannot be easily stated, due to the great irregularity of their outlines. There are several tiers of galleries, and the vertical depth from the highest to the lowest is 260 feet (79 m).
Luray Cavern waters
There is a spring of water called Dream Lake that has an almost mirror like appearance. Stalactites are reflected in the water making them appear to be stalagmites. This illusion is often so convincing that people are unable to see the real bottom. It looks quite deep, as the stalactites are higher above the water, but at its deepest point the water is only around 20 inches deep. The lake is connected to a spring that continues deeper into the caverns. The Wishing Well is a green pond with coins three feet deep at the bottom. Like Dream Lake, the well also gives an illusion, however it is reversed. The pond looks 3-4 feet deep but at its deepest point it is actually 6-7 feet deep.
History
Discovery
Luray Caverns was discovered on August 13, 1878 by five local men, including Andrew J. Campbell (a local tinsmith), his 13-year-old nephew Quint, and local photographer Benton Stebbins.[1] Their attention had been attracted by a protruding limestone outcrop and by a nearby sinkhole noted to have cool air issuing from it. Seeking an underground cavern, the men started to dig and, about 4 hours later, a hole was created for the smallest men (Andrew and Quint) to squeeze through, slide down a rope and explore by candlelight. The first column they saw was named the Washington Column, in honor of the first United States President. Upon entering the area called Skeleton's Gorge, bone fragments (among other artifacts) were found embedded in calcite. Other traces of previous human occupation included pieces of charcoal, flint, and human bone fragments embedded in stalagmite. A skeleton, thought to be that of a Native American girl, found in one of the chasms, was estimated, from the current rate of stalagmitic growth, to be not more than 500 years old. Her remains may have slipped into the caverns after her burial hole collapsed due to a sinkhole, although the real cause is unknown. They are now in storage at the National Museum of American History in Washington, D.C.
Litigation
Sam Buracker of Luray owned the land on which the cavern entrance was found. Because of uncollected debts, a court-ordered auction of all his land was held on September 14, 1878. Andrew Campbell, William Campbell, and Benton Stebbins purchased the cave tract, but kept their discovery secret until after the sale. Because the true value of the property was not realized until after the purchase, legal wrangling ensued for the next 2 years with attempts to prove fraud and decide rightful ownership. In April 1881, the Supreme Court of Virginia nullified the purchase by the cave discoverers. William T. Biedler of Baltimore (Buracker's in-law and major creditor) then sold the property to The Luray Cave and Hotel Company, a subsidiary of the Shenandoah Railroad Company. (The SRC became the Norfolk and Western Railroad Company in April 1881.) David Kagery of Luray and George Marshall of Uniontown, Pennsylvania, purchased the property in July 1890 and in October of that year the tract was sold to the Valley Land and Improvement Company. Under bankruptcy proceedings in 1893, the property was bought by Luray Caverns Company, owned by J. Kemp Bartlett of Baltimore.
Despite the legal disputes, rumors of the caverns' impressive formations spread quickly. Professor Jerome J. Collins, the Arctic explorer, postponed his departure on an ill-fated North Pole expedition to visit the caverns. The Smithsonian Institution sent a delegation of nine scientists to investigate. The next edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica devoted an unprecedented page and a half to the cave's wonders and Alexander J. Brand, Jr., a correspondent for the New York Times, was the first professional travel writer to visit and popularize the Caverns.
Sanatorium
In 1901, the cool, supposedly pure air of Luray Caverns was forced through the rooms of the Limair Sanatorium, erected on the summit of Cave Hill by Colonel T.C. Northcott, former president of the Luray Caverns Corporation.[1] The Colonel billed "Limair," as the first air-conditioned home in the United States. On the hottest day in summer, the interior of the house was kept at a cool and comfortable 70 °F (21 °C). By sinking a shaft five feet in diameter down to a cavern chamber and installing a 42-inch (1,100 mm) fan powered by a 5 horsepower (3.7 kW) electric motor, Northcott’s system could change out the air through the entire house about every 4 minutes. Tests made over successive years by means of culture media and sterile plates, were considered to have demonstrated the "perfect bacteriologic purity" of the air, purportedly a benefit to those suffering various respiratory illnesses. This "purity" was explained by a natural filtration process with air drawn into the caverns through myriad rocky crevices, then further cleansing by air floating over the transparent springs and pools, the product finally being supplied to the inmates of the sanatorium. (The "Limair" burned down in the early 1900s but was subsequently rebuilt as a brick building.) The Luray Caverns Corporation, which was chartered by Northcott, purchased the caverns in February 1905 and continues to hold the property today.
Portions of the Caverns are open to the public and have long been electrically lighted. The registered number of visitors in 1906 was 18,000, but now, about 500,000 guests visit each year.
In 1974, the National Park Service and the Department of Interior designated Luray Caverns as a National Natural Landmark.
Friday, March 26, 2010
Encyclopedia Brown as an Introduction to Scientific Method
When I was a young kid - over 30 years ago! - I read all the Encyclopedia Brown books (by Donald J. Sobol), and I always tried to solve the mysteries before Encyclopedia Brown did.
What I didn't realize at the time was that these books were giving me an introduction to the scientific method - always listen closely, pay attention to ever little detail, and make deductions based on facts, not on guess work.
Ever since then, I've always been very punctilious (precise, demanding; careful, conscientious) when it comes to believing what people tell me - whether it is friends, acquaintances, strangers, or what I read in the newspapers.
Take the case of Global Warming, for example. For decades the public - around the world- have been told that man-made Global Warming (as opposed to natural global warming) will cause oceans to rise, polar bears to die, and so on. Within the last year, however, evidence has come to light which shows that the global warming data had been falsified, mis-represented, and even suppressed, in order to bring us where we are today - with companies having to spend millions of dollars to "green" themselves.
With what result? The new "spaghetti" light bulbs that are supposed to last longer than our current lightbulbs have dangerous chemicals in them, and have to be disposed of in a hazardous landfill! Electric bikes are propelled by batteries made out of lead, and since batteries only hold a charge for so long, dead batteries have to be thrown away... in hazard landfills because they too have dangerous chemicals in them!
The job as a scientist is to evaluate all the evidence, and come to a conclusion. A real conclusion, not one that fits a theory that you have formed in advance. As time goes on, you will find more evidence. If it fits your theory - it strengthens your theory. If it doesn't fit your theory, it must not be discarded, but rather put in a place of prominence until it can be explained.
What I didn't realize at the time was that these books were giving me an introduction to the scientific method - always listen closely, pay attention to ever little detail, and make deductions based on facts, not on guess work.
Ever since then, I've always been very punctilious (precise, demanding; careful, conscientious) when it comes to believing what people tell me - whether it is friends, acquaintances, strangers, or what I read in the newspapers.
Take the case of Global Warming, for example. For decades the public - around the world- have been told that man-made Global Warming (as opposed to natural global warming) will cause oceans to rise, polar bears to die, and so on. Within the last year, however, evidence has come to light which shows that the global warming data had been falsified, mis-represented, and even suppressed, in order to bring us where we are today - with companies having to spend millions of dollars to "green" themselves.
With what result? The new "spaghetti" light bulbs that are supposed to last longer than our current lightbulbs have dangerous chemicals in them, and have to be disposed of in a hazardous landfill! Electric bikes are propelled by batteries made out of lead, and since batteries only hold a charge for so long, dead batteries have to be thrown away... in hazard landfills because they too have dangerous chemicals in them!
The job as a scientist is to evaluate all the evidence, and come to a conclusion. A real conclusion, not one that fits a theory that you have formed in advance. As time goes on, you will find more evidence. If it fits your theory - it strengthens your theory. If it doesn't fit your theory, it must not be discarded, but rather put in a place of prominence until it can be explained.
Thursday, March 25, 2010
The Search for Atlantis
Everybody has probably heard of Atlantis, an island-nation that sank beneath the waves thousands of years ago. Young kids might know about Atlantis because of the two Disney movies from a while ago. Of course, in their version, the Atlanteans are still alive, living in a protected dome that keeps out the water.
If Atlantis were a real place, of course there would be no question of that! It would just be a city covered under a lot of mud (sediment deposited over thousands of years) and marine archaeologists would have to dig through it all using machinery that would take years and years to excavate the site, because of the complexity involved.
Atlantis probably never existed - the only account we have about Atlantis comes from a narrative written about 400 years after the continent is supposed to have disappeared, by Plato.
This is what Wikipedia has to say about Atlantis:
Having said that, there are lots of submerged cities that can be excavated...after a fashion.
and
Archaeologists from the University of Texas have been excavating the city since 1981.
If Atlantis were a real place, of course there would be no question of that! It would just be a city covered under a lot of mud (sediment deposited over thousands of years) and marine archaeologists would have to dig through it all using machinery that would take years and years to excavate the site, because of the complexity involved.
Atlantis probably never existed - the only account we have about Atlantis comes from a narrative written about 400 years after the continent is supposed to have disappeared, by Plato.
This is what Wikipedia has to say about Atlantis:
Atlantis was first mentioned in Plato's dialogues Timaeus and Critias.
In Plato's account, Atlantis was a naval power lying "in front of the Pillars of Hercules" that conquered many parts of Western Europe and Africa 9,000 years before the time of Solon, or approximately 9600 BC. After a failed attempt to invade Athens, Atlantis sank into the ocean "in a single day and night of misfortune".
Scholars dispute whether and how much Plato's story or account was inspired by older traditions. Some scholars argue Plato drew upon memories of past events such as the Thera eruption or the Trojan War, while others insist that he took inspiration from contemporary events like the destruction of Helike in 373 BC[1] or the failed Athenian invasion of Sicily in 415–413 BC.
The possible existence of a genuine Atlantis was discussed throughout classical antiquity, but it was usually rejected and occasionally parodied by later authors. As Alan Cameron states: "It is only in modern times that people have taken the Atlantis story seriously; no one did so in antiquity".[2] While little known during the Middle Ages, the story of Atlantis was rediscovered by Humanists in the Early Modern period. Plato's description inspired the utopian works of several Renaissance writers, like Francis Bacon's "New Atlantis". Atlantis inspires today's literature, from science fiction to comic books to films, its name having become a byword for any and all supposed advanced prehistoric lost civilizations.
Having said that, there are lots of submerged cities that can be excavated...after a fashion.
Port Royal was a city located at the end of the Palisadoes at the mouth of the Kingston Harbour, in southeastern Jamaica. Founded in 1518, it was the centre of shipping commerce in the Caribbean Sea during the latter half of the 17th century. It was destroyed by an earthquake in 1692 and subsequent fires, hurricanes, flooding, epidemics and another earthquake in 1907.
Port Royal was once home to privateers employed to nip at superpower Habsburg Spain's empire when smaller European powers dared not directly make war on Spain. As a port city, it was notorious for its gaudy displays of wealth and loose morals and was a popular homeport for the English- and Dutch- sponsored privateers to spend their treasure during the 17th century. When those governments abandoned the practice of issuing letters of marque against the Spanish treasure fleets and possessions in the later 16th century, many privateers turned pirate and used the city as their main base during the heyday of the Caribbean pirates in the 17th century. Pirates from around the world congregated at Port Royal coming from waters as far away as Madagascar.
After the 1692 disaster, Port Royal's commercial role was steadily taken over by the town (and later, city) of Kingston. Current plans for Port Royal will redevelop the small fishing town into a tourist destination serviced by cruise ships with archaeological findings at the heart of the attractions.
and
Today, Port Royal is known to post-medieval archaeologists as the "City that Sank". It is considered the most important underwater archaeological site in the western hemisphere[citation needed], yielding 16th–and-17th-century artifacts and many important treasures from indigenous peoples predating the 1588 founding, some from as far away as Guatemala. Several 17th and early 18th century pirate ships sank within Kingston Harbour and are being carefully harvested under controlled conditions by different teams of archaeologists. Other "digs" are staked out along various quarters and streets by different teams.
Archaeologists from the University of Texas have been excavating the city since 1981.
In 1981, the Nautical Archaeology Program of Texas A&M University, in cooperation with the Institute of Nautical Archaeology (INA) and the Jamaica National Heritage Trust (JNHT), began underwater archaeological investigations of the submerged portion of the 17th-century town of Port Royal, Jamaica. Present evidence indicates that while the areas of Port Royal that lay along the edge of the harbor slid and jumbled as they sank, destroying most of the archaeological context, the area investigated by TAMU / INA, located some distance from the harbor, sank vertically, with minimal horizontal disturbance.
Sunday, March 21, 2010
Girl Dinosaurologist: Buddy Books for 2nd graders
For the very youngest girl dinosaurologists, there is a series of books by BuddyBooks on dinosaurs.
The books are written by various authors, and published by the Abdo Publishing Company. According to their website, Dinosaur Series, the books are written for second graders, or those reading at a second grade level.
The most difficult thing for new readers to comprehend in dealing with dinosaurs is those long names! Each name is spelled out phonetically at the beginning of the book, but parents might need to help their little ones to sound out the names.
Here's a sample of one of the covers:
Allosaurus
Ankylosaurus
Apatosaurus (Brontosaurus as far as I'm concerned!!!)
Archeopteryx
Baryonyx
Brachiosaurus
Camarasaurus
Coelophysis
Compsognathus
Corythosaurus
Deinonychus
Diplodocus
Giganotosaurus
Iguanodon
Oviraptor
Pachycephalosaurus
Spinosaurus
Stegosaurus
Styracosaurus
Triceratops
Troodon
Tyrannosaurus Rex
Velociraptor
Here's a sample of the text:
The Brachiosaurus (BRACK--ee-uh-SAW-rus) was a huge, plant-eating dinosaur. It is one of the biggest animals ever.
The Brachiosaurus was 82 feet (25 m) long. It stood about 50 feet (15 m) tall. That is as tall as three giraffes on top of each other.
The Brachiosaurus weighed about 130,000 pounds (58,967 kg). That is as heavy as 13 elephants.
The books are divided into the following topics:
What Were They?
How Did They Move?
Why Was it Special?
Land of the Brachiosaurus
The Family Tree
Who Else Lived There?
What Did They Eat?
Who Were Their Enemies?
Family Life
Discovery
Where Are They Today?
Fun Dinosaur Websites
Important Words
Index
The books are written by various authors, and published by the Abdo Publishing Company. According to their website, Dinosaur Series, the books are written for second graders, or those reading at a second grade level.
The most difficult thing for new readers to comprehend in dealing with dinosaurs is those long names! Each name is spelled out phonetically at the beginning of the book, but parents might need to help their little ones to sound out the names.
Here's a sample of one of the covers:
Allosaurus
Ankylosaurus
Apatosaurus (Brontosaurus as far as I'm concerned!!!)
Archeopteryx
Baryonyx
Brachiosaurus
Camarasaurus
Coelophysis
Compsognathus
Corythosaurus
Deinonychus
Diplodocus
Giganotosaurus
Iguanodon
Oviraptor
Pachycephalosaurus
Spinosaurus
Stegosaurus
Styracosaurus
Triceratops
Troodon
Tyrannosaurus Rex
Velociraptor
Here's a sample of the text:
The Brachiosaurus (BRACK--ee-uh-SAW-rus) was a huge, plant-eating dinosaur. It is one of the biggest animals ever.
The Brachiosaurus was 82 feet (25 m) long. It stood about 50 feet (15 m) tall. That is as tall as three giraffes on top of each other.
The Brachiosaurus weighed about 130,000 pounds (58,967 kg). That is as heavy as 13 elephants.
The books are divided into the following topics:
What Were They?
How Did They Move?
Why Was it Special?
Land of the Brachiosaurus
The Family Tree
Who Else Lived There?
What Did They Eat?
Who Were Their Enemies?
Family Life
Discovery
Where Are They Today?
Fun Dinosaur Websites
Important Words
Index
Saturday, March 20, 2010
Girl Dinosaurologist
A Dinosaurologist is someone who studies dinosaurs. It is a relatively new term, indeed it doesn't even appear at http://www.dictionary.com.
The official term for a dinosaurologist is actually a paleontologist. The definition of that is:
So there are a lot of different fields that a paleontologist studies. So one who specializes in studying dinosaurs (not all animals that lived in prehistoric times were dinosaurs) can be called a dinosaurologist.
Here is a webpage that features links to practically every dinosaur-related website on the planet.
So you want to be a paleontologist/dinosaurologist:
(from I Want To Be A Paleontologist ! Advice for Students and Parents
Paleontological Research Institution, Ithaca, NY)
What background do I need in high school?
The best starting point is a college preparatory program with
----as many science and math courses as possible.
Outside reading in paleontology and visiting museums with fossil displays is helpful for building up knowledge of fossils themselves.
No matter how interested or knowledgeable a student is in paleontology, however, good overall grades in high school are almost always required for admission to a good college or university, which is a necessary prerequisite for a career in paleontology.
What background do I need in college?
Strong background in the sciences is absolutely essential, with strong concentration in
----both biology and geology.
An undergraduate institution should be chosen on the basis of its quality of general science education and especially the quality of its biology and geology programs.
At this stage the student often has to make a difficult decision about whether to major in biology or geology.
The ideal arrangement is a double-major, with full undergraduate training in both biology and geology. If this is not possible, the best solution is to major in one and take substantial course work in the other.
Liberal arts courses should not be ignored. A good reading knowledge of a modern language (especially German, French or Russian) should be obtained as an undergraduate. Don't wait until graduate school!
At least a full year of chemistry, physics, and mathematics through calculus, (ew, calculus!)
are required by most graduate programs and should be taken as early as possible as an undergraduate. (I say ew, but thousands and thousands of women paleontologists have done it. Don't be afraid to hire tutors if you are having difficulty with the concepts of higher math. Join a math club, etc.)
The courses that are most pertinent to paleontology include the following:
-- mineralogy,
-- stratigraphy/sedimentation,
-- sedimentary petrology,
-- invertebrate paleontology,
-- ecology,
-- invertebrate and vertebrate zoology,
-- evolutionary biology,
-- genetics
Ability in
--statistical analysis and
---solid computer skills
are absolutely required in modern paleontology and should not be left for graduate school. The more courses and experience in these areas at the undergraduate level, the better.
So important are these things that at Girl Scientist, you are going to start them right now, no matter how old you are!
I like to keep actual, physical notebooks in which I write all my notes from books I read, terminology I want to learn, and so on. However, if you are used to recording everything on your computer, feel free to do that, too. I find that it helps me cement data in my head if I rewrite the information in my own words on actual paper. However, you alone know best what your study habits and learning habits are.
The official term for a dinosaurologist is actually a paleontologist. The definition of that is:
The study of the forms of life existing in prehistoric or geologic times, as represented by the fossils of plants, animals, and other organisms
So there are a lot of different fields that a paleontologist studies. So one who specializes in studying dinosaurs (not all animals that lived in prehistoric times were dinosaurs) can be called a dinosaurologist.
Here is a webpage that features links to practically every dinosaur-related website on the planet.
So you want to be a paleontologist/dinosaurologist:
(from I Want To Be A Paleontologist ! Advice for Students and Parents
Paleontological Research Institution, Ithaca, NY)
What background do I need in high school?
The best starting point is a college preparatory program with
----as many science and math courses as possible.
Outside reading in paleontology and visiting museums with fossil displays is helpful for building up knowledge of fossils themselves.
No matter how interested or knowledgeable a student is in paleontology, however, good overall grades in high school are almost always required for admission to a good college or university, which is a necessary prerequisite for a career in paleontology.
What background do I need in college?
Strong background in the sciences is absolutely essential, with strong concentration in
----both biology and geology.
An undergraduate institution should be chosen on the basis of its quality of general science education and especially the quality of its biology and geology programs.
At this stage the student often has to make a difficult decision about whether to major in biology or geology.
The ideal arrangement is a double-major, with full undergraduate training in both biology and geology. If this is not possible, the best solution is to major in one and take substantial course work in the other.
Liberal arts courses should not be ignored. A good reading knowledge of a modern language (especially German, French or Russian) should be obtained as an undergraduate. Don't wait until graduate school!
At least a full year of chemistry, physics, and mathematics through calculus, (ew, calculus!)
are required by most graduate programs and should be taken as early as possible as an undergraduate. (I say ew, but thousands and thousands of women paleontologists have done it. Don't be afraid to hire tutors if you are having difficulty with the concepts of higher math. Join a math club, etc.)
The courses that are most pertinent to paleontology include the following:
-- mineralogy,
-- stratigraphy/sedimentation,
-- sedimentary petrology,
-- invertebrate paleontology,
-- ecology,
-- invertebrate and vertebrate zoology,
-- evolutionary biology,
-- genetics
Ability in
--statistical analysis and
---solid computer skills
are absolutely required in modern paleontology and should not be left for graduate school. The more courses and experience in these areas at the undergraduate level, the better.
So important are these things that at Girl Scientist, you are going to start them right now, no matter how old you are!
I like to keep actual, physical notebooks in which I write all my notes from books I read, terminology I want to learn, and so on. However, if you are used to recording everything on your computer, feel free to do that, too. I find that it helps me cement data in my head if I rewrite the information in my own words on actual paper. However, you alone know best what your study habits and learning habits are.
Friday, March 19, 2010
Girl Scientist Sourcebook: Hypatia
A Girl Scientist Sourcebook is a living document, in which we will compile - over the course of time - all books, websites and other media on the scientist in question.
Hypatia (355 - 415)
Books
Super Women in Science (The Women's Hall of Fame Series)
. Kelly Di Domenico. The Women's Hall of Fame Series. Second Story Press. 2002.
Flow down Like Silver: Hypatia of Alexandria, a Novel (Volume 1)
Hypatia of Alexandria (Revealing Antiquity , No 8)
Websites
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypatia
http://www.agnesscott.edu/lriddle/women/hypatia.htm
http://members.cox.net/jhaldenwang/Hypatia.htm
Hypatia (355 - 415)
born between AD 350 and 370; died March 415, was a Greek scholar from Alexandria in Egypt, considered the first notable woman in mathematics, who also taught philosophy and astronomy. She lived in Roman Egypt, and was killed by a Christian mob who falsely blamed her for religious turmoil. Some suggest that her murder marked the end of what is traditionally known as Classical antiquity, although others such as Christian Wildberg observe that Hellenistic philosophy continued to flourish until the age of Justinian in the sixth century.
A Neoplatonist philosopher, she belonged to the mathematical tradition of the Academy of Athens represented by Eudoxus of Cnidus;[11] she followed the school of the 3rd century thinker Plotinus, discouraging empirical enquiry and encouraging logical and mathematical studies.
Wikipedia
Books
Super Women in Science (The Women's Hall of Fame Series)
. Kelly Di Domenico. The Women's Hall of Fame Series. Second Story Press. 2002.
Flow down Like Silver: Hypatia of Alexandria, a Novel (Volume 1)
Hypatia of Alexandria (Revealing Antiquity , No 8)
Websites
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypatia
http://www.agnesscott.edu/lriddle/women/hypatia.htm
http://members.cox.net/jhaldenwang/Hypatia.htm
Super Women In Science, by Kelly Di Domenico
Super Women In Science, by Kelly Di Domenico. Second Story Press. 2002
In one way I find the title of this book unfortunate. "Super women" implies that the women in this book all had "super powers" that mere mortal women could never hope to aspire to. And that of course is wrong. The "super" part of the title is that these women all had an interest in some aspect of science, at a time when they were thought of as second class citizens whose only function in life was to take care of the home and have babies, and any woman who tried to get out of that sphere faced the wrath of both men and women, who wanted women to keep to their place. It takes a lot of courage to stand up for yourself in that way.
Biographies in this book, suitable for children and teens, I think, are:
Hypatia (355 - 415) - a mathematician
Mary Anning (1799 - 1847) - fossil discoverer
Harriet Brooks Pilcher (1876 - 1933) - nuclear physicist
Maria Goeppert-Mayer (1906 - 1972) - theoretical physicist
Rachel Carson (1907 - 1963) - marine biologist and nature writer
Chien-Shiung Wu (1912 - 1997) - physicist
Rosalind Franklin (1920 - 1958) - biophysicist
Birute Galdikas (1946 - ) primatologist, conservationist, ethologist, and author
Catherine Hickson (1955 - ) - volcanologist
Mae Jemison (1956 - ) - astronaut
In one way I find the title of this book unfortunate. "Super women" implies that the women in this book all had "super powers" that mere mortal women could never hope to aspire to. And that of course is wrong. The "super" part of the title is that these women all had an interest in some aspect of science, at a time when they were thought of as second class citizens whose only function in life was to take care of the home and have babies, and any woman who tried to get out of that sphere faced the wrath of both men and women, who wanted women to keep to their place. It takes a lot of courage to stand up for yourself in that way.
Biographies in this book, suitable for children and teens, I think, are:
Hypatia (355 - 415) - a mathematician
Mary Anning (1799 - 1847) - fossil discoverer
Harriet Brooks Pilcher (1876 - 1933) - nuclear physicist
Maria Goeppert-Mayer (1906 - 1972) - theoretical physicist
Rachel Carson (1907 - 1963) - marine biologist and nature writer
Chien-Shiung Wu (1912 - 1997) - physicist
Rosalind Franklin (1920 - 1958) - biophysicist
Birute Galdikas (1946 - ) primatologist, conservationist, ethologist, and author
Catherine Hickson (1955 - ) - volcanologist
Mae Jemison (1956 - ) - astronaut
Girl Mathematician: Math is of the utmost importance
Whether it is a girl or a boy, a knowledge of math is of the utmost importance.
Of course there's math and there's higher mathematics. I'm speeking of math. The ability to add, subtract, divide and do percentages. These are necessary simply to get along in the world - to fill out a timecard, balance one's checkbook (or check-card), plan a budget, take a vacation, and so on.
As I posted a few days ago, it is a myth that girls can't be as good at math as boys...it is simply that girls are pressured, from a young age, to forget about trying to do math, because everyone knows girls aren't any good at it. (This despite the fact that most bookkeepers are women, etc. Well, of course that isn't higher math...)
Anyway, I urge you, regardless of how old your child is, to encourage in her a love of mathematics. Start her early, and work on the simplest math problems. Also start her early on learning how to save money, and the value of money!
Many people - male or female - will never be able to grasp the concepts in higher mathematics. There is nothing wrong with this. But they should be encouraged to grasp as much about math as they posssibly can.
Make an effort to keep your girl(s) interested in math when it does move into the realm of higher mathematics - algebra, trigonometry, geometry and so on. If they do show an interest...and all of a sudden stop...do a little probing to find out if they're being teased in school because of their prowess. Unfortunately, a lot of girls who are good at a certain subject will drop it immediately should they be teased by their peers. And female peers, even at a young age, so enjoy teasing....
Sometimes the child (boy or girl) can grasp these concepts, but just isn't ready to. Be patient, perhaps hire a tutor if you are not comfortable with helping her with her homework. Find a math club for girls - or form one yourself.
Education is under fire in this country. I won't go into that, except to say that in the final analysis, a person's education is their own responsbility - or if they are children, the responsibility of their parents. With access to the internet, a child can take math classes, or any other type of class, visit the entire world, learn anything they want to learn.
It is up to the parent to instill in their child a love of learning. To work with teachers to make their child the best-educated that that child can be.
Of course there's math and there's higher mathematics. I'm speeking of math. The ability to add, subtract, divide and do percentages. These are necessary simply to get along in the world - to fill out a timecard, balance one's checkbook (or check-card), plan a budget, take a vacation, and so on.
As I posted a few days ago, it is a myth that girls can't be as good at math as boys...it is simply that girls are pressured, from a young age, to forget about trying to do math, because everyone knows girls aren't any good at it. (This despite the fact that most bookkeepers are women, etc. Well, of course that isn't higher math...)
Anyway, I urge you, regardless of how old your child is, to encourage in her a love of mathematics. Start her early, and work on the simplest math problems. Also start her early on learning how to save money, and the value of money!
Many people - male or female - will never be able to grasp the concepts in higher mathematics. There is nothing wrong with this. But they should be encouraged to grasp as much about math as they posssibly can.
Make an effort to keep your girl(s) interested in math when it does move into the realm of higher mathematics - algebra, trigonometry, geometry and so on. If they do show an interest...and all of a sudden stop...do a little probing to find out if they're being teased in school because of their prowess. Unfortunately, a lot of girls who are good at a certain subject will drop it immediately should they be teased by their peers. And female peers, even at a young age, so enjoy teasing....
Sometimes the child (boy or girl) can grasp these concepts, but just isn't ready to. Be patient, perhaps hire a tutor if you are not comfortable with helping her with her homework. Find a math club for girls - or form one yourself.
Education is under fire in this country. I won't go into that, except to say that in the final analysis, a person's education is their own responsbility - or if they are children, the responsibility of their parents. With access to the internet, a child can take math classes, or any other type of class, visit the entire world, learn anything they want to learn.
It is up to the parent to instill in their child a love of learning. To work with teachers to make their child the best-educated that that child can be.
Thursday, March 18, 2010
Encourage girls to be proud of their math skills
Edited to fix the title! Skills, not schools!
http://www.nncc.org/Curriculum/sac52_math.science.girls.html
and the article continues:
GO to the link to read the complete article.
http://www.nncc.org/Curriculum/sac52_math.science.girls.html
In 1992, Mattel Toys put the first talking Barbie doll on the market. Barbie's first words were, "Math class is tough." Mattel thought they were simply expressing the feelings of most school-age girls. Many parents and teachers, though, thought Barbie should keep her mouth shut. As a result, Barbie stopped talking.
The controversy surrounding Barbie and her statement about math highlights a concern in this country about male-female differences in math and science. Although the gender gap has narrowed over the years, boys continue to outperform girls on standardized tests of math and science achievement. At the same time, girls' attitudes about math and science have become more negative. Many girls feel that they are not good at math and science and say that they do not like these subjects. These trends are troubling because girls' grades in math and science classes are often equal to or better than those of boys. In other words, girls can do math and science. Nevertheless, in high school when students are allowed to choose courses, girls are more likely than boys to opt out of advanced math and science. As a result, girls are often less prepared for certain academic disciplines. This limits both their college major and career choices. The question is: Why do we see these differences?
and the article continues:
Until recently, it was believed that male-female differences in math and science were caused by biology. In other words, girls' and boys' brains are different, so they are better suited for different things. The notion is that boys have superior spatial abilities, making them better suited for certain mathematical manipulations. Girls, on the other hand, are supposed to be better at language and writing. Evidence shows that boys do excel in math, and girls appear to do better in verbal-related skills. But are these differences a result of biology, or do other factors play a role?
More recently, researchers have focused on the influence of the social environment on children's math and science achievement. Very early on, boys are given the chance to tinker with toys or objects (for example, building blocks, Legos, racing cars, and simple machines) that involve many of the principles inherent in math and science. Girls often lack these experiences, so they enter math and science classrooms feeling insecure about their abilities. Girls then begin to believe they cannot do math and science as well as boys. This belief is consistent with a stereotype in our culture that defines math and science as male domains. That is, males are better suited for math and science, and math and science are more useful to males than to females. Also, personality traits attributed to mathematicians and scientists are associated more with males. Mathematicians and scientists are often thought to be competitive, achievement-oriented, and not very social.
GO to the link to read the complete article.
Wednesday, March 17, 2010
Biographies of women mathematicians
http://www.agnesscott.edu/Lriddle/women/women.htm
The International Conference of Women Mathematicians (ICWM) 2010 will take place in Hyderabad, India, on August 17 and 18, 2010, over the two days immediately before the International Congress of Mathematicians in 2010. The meeting is aimed principally at women mathematicians attending the ICM (though men are also very welcome to attend), and in particular at young women mathematicians and women from Asia and from developing countries. More Information
Kirsten Wickelgren and Melanie Matchett Wood have been selected as this year's Five-Year fellows of the American Institute of Mathematics. Wickelgren received her undergraduate degree from Harvard University and her PhD at Stanford. She will use her fellowship to continue her research at Harvard. Wood, a graduate of Duke University with a Master's degree from Cambridge University and a PhD from Princeton, will work at Stanford University. For more information, see the announcement from the AIM or the Autumn 2009 AIM Newsletter (pages 4-5).
The seven members of the USA team for the 2009 China Girls Math Olympiad, held August 11-16 in Xiamen, Fujian Province, China, all won metals. Pictured in the front row, from left to right: Carolyn Kim, Patricia Li, Jing-Jing (Shiyu) Li, Joy Zheng, Cynthia Day, Ramya Rangan, and Elizabeth Synge; behind the team in the second row are the teams' coaches: Jennifer Iglesias (a member of the US CGMO team in 2007 and 2008) and Zuming Feng, of Phillips Exeter Academy and academic director of the USAMO Summer Program since 2003. Shiyu Li and Joy Zheng each received a Gold medal, while the other five received either a Silver or Bronze medal (for the full results, see the MSRI press release). Read their online journal at the website of one of the team's sponsors, the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute (MSRI). The journal describes their experiences at the Mathematical Olympiad Summer Program at the University of Nebraska and their trip to China. The website also has links to past US teams' travelogues.
"An analysis of contemporary data has provided new evidence discrediting the notion that females are innately less capable than males at doing mathematics, especially at the highest level." Read more about the report from Janet E. Mertz and Janet S. Hyde of the University of Wisconsin-Madison at the MAA Mathematical Sciences Digital Library.
Oscar winner filmmaker Alejandro Amenabar (of The Others) is the writer and director for a new movie called Agora, a historical drama set in early Egypt. According to the TimesofMalta.com website, "Oscar-winning actress Rachel Wiesz plays astrologer-philosopher Hypatia of Alexandria who fights to save the collected wisdom of the ancient world." The film was expected to be released in the United States in December 2009 but has been delayed to 2010
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Girl scientist T-shirt
This is a commercial website that sells Girl Scientist T-shirts.
I actually dont' care for the T-shirt itself, it's just a few scientific instruments on a T-shirt with the words Girl Scientist.... neverthless its something!
http://www.zazzle.com/girl_scientist_tshirt-235517951862102901
Monday, March 15, 2010
Women's Adventures In Science
Here's a website that encourages girls to embrace science.
http://www.iwaswondering.org/
The Book Series:
Bone Detective: The Story of Forensic Anthropologist Diane France By Lorraine Jean Hopping
Gorilla Mountain: The Story of Wildlife Biologist Amy Vedder By Rene Ebersole
Beyond Jupiter: The Story of Planetary Astronomer Heidi Hammel By Fred Bortz
Strong Force: The Story of Physicist Shirley Ann Jackson By Diane O'Connell
Forecast Earth: The Story of Climate Scientist Inez Fung By Renee Skelton
Space Rocks: The Story of Planetary Geologist Adriana Ocampo By Lorraine Jean Hopping
Robo World: The Story of Robot Designer Cynthia Breazeal By Jordan D. Brown
People Person: The Story of Sociologist Marta Tienda By Diane O'Connell
Gene Hunter: The Story of Neuropsychologist Nancy Wexler By Adele Glimm
Nature's Machines: The Story of Biomechanist Mimi Koehl By Deborah Parks
http://www.iwaswondering.org/
The Web site iWASwondering.org is inspired by Women's Adventures in Science, a biography series for middle-school-aged students co-published by the Joseph Henry Press and Scholastic Library Publishing. Women's Adventures in Science chronicles the lives of contemporary, working scientists. Despite their varied backgrounds and life stories, these remarkable women all share one important belief: the work they do is important and it can make the world a better place.
Each of the women profiled in the series participated in her book's creation by sharing important details about her life, providing personal photographs to help illustrate the story, making family, friends, and colleagues available for interviews, and explaining her scientific specialty in ways that will inform and engage young readers. The scientists also participated directly in the creation of the Web site.
The book series and this Web site would not have been possible without the generous assistance of Sara Lee Schupf and the National Academy of Sciences, an individual and an organization united in the belief that the pursuit of science is crucial to our understanding of how the world works and in the recognition that women must play a central role in all areas of science.
Enhancements to this Web site, including the addition of the moderated forum Ask It!, were possible thanks to the generous contributions of the Henry Luce Foundation, the Sigma-Aldrich Foundation, Robert and Mary Galvin, and George and Cynthia Mitchell. Their support of this project is greatly appreciated by the National Academy of Sciences.
The Book Series:
Bone Detective: The Story of Forensic Anthropologist Diane France By Lorraine Jean Hopping
Gorilla Mountain: The Story of Wildlife Biologist Amy Vedder By Rene Ebersole
Beyond Jupiter: The Story of Planetary Astronomer Heidi Hammel By Fred Bortz
Strong Force: The Story of Physicist Shirley Ann Jackson By Diane O'Connell
Forecast Earth: The Story of Climate Scientist Inez Fung By Renee Skelton
Space Rocks: The Story of Planetary Geologist Adriana Ocampo By Lorraine Jean Hopping
Robo World: The Story of Robot Designer Cynthia Breazeal By Jordan D. Brown
People Person: The Story of Sociologist Marta Tienda By Diane O'Connell
Gene Hunter: The Story of Neuropsychologist Nancy Wexler By Adele Glimm
Nature's Machines: The Story of Biomechanist Mimi Koehl By Deborah Parks
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)